Category Archives: Browns

Revenge of the Dawgs

Hat tip to Tom Bruce for the video

Madden 2011 Karma

It takes a special Madden player to play with the Cleveland Browns every game. I am such a person.

Year in, year out, the Browns tend to suck with their overall team rating. This year is no different, but for some reason, the Browns aren’t actually half bad. Heck, they just beat the Packers (yes, I know it was pre-season, but Delhomme, Wallace, and Dawson made me smile.) As a Cleveland fan, you learn to manipulate which plays and which players work best, and focus on those, just like grade school football — I played flag football for one year, St. Dominic’s didn’t have an actual team past that.

So, tonight, I played my first game of Madden 2011 online. As the Browns, I played away against the San Diego chargers. The game was going fine. I opted to kick first, and they scored on their opening drive. I scored subsequently, and it was a tit-for-tat scoring game until I intercepted a ball and took the lead, which I maintained going into the fourth quarter.

This kid was talking trash the whole game. I opted not to say a thing until the third quarter when he mocked my selection of a wildcat offense. Cribbs made an amazing throw for a first down and a modest game, so I turned my microphone on (I have a Motorola headset like the coaches use that I got for $4, thanks Woot!) and whispered “WILDCAT!” and summarily turned it back off.

Going into the fourth quarter he gets the ball and scores. He’s been going for two the entire game with 100% success to chip away at my lead. Not this time. He misses. I get the ball, leading 38 to 37. Unfortunately, for the first time in the entire game with no turnovers, I go 3 and out, and decide to go for it on fourth down. I didn’t get the first, and got my first turnover. This kid was ecstatic — and he let me know through a slew of expletives.

Going down the field, the Browns defense was spectacular and I shut down his run game. With less than 40 seconds to go, he gets in the red zone (which is sponsored by Old Spice in Madden 2011) and starts running down the clock. I burn all of my time-outs, but that’s not the end of the world. I am fairly good at quick scores with no time outs, and I have Phil Dawson, but he won’t save me in this case like he did the Browns on Saturday since I’m only up by 1 — unless he only manages a field goal.

Here’s where my one psychology class comes in (thanks SLU!). I click back on my microphone. This kid’s been talking trash the entire game. The bane of my online existence in Madden 10 was where Pete played defense and I offense. We actually beat some guy using the best team in the game with Bruce Gradkowski at QB. He quit and we heckled him. Sure, it hurt my rating, but screw it, he lost to the ’09 Browns with Bruce Gradkowski.

My microphone is on and I ask him, “so, you’ve been talking trash the whole game, and you’re having the QB take a knee against the Cleveland Browns?” His reply, “yep.” I ask further, “how long have you been playing this game?” He replies, “oh, I don’t know….” I josh him back, “yeah right, you just don’t want to lose to the Cleveland Browns and you know I can win unless you run out the clock.” At this point, he’s teed up his field goal team and is ready to probably seal the deal.

I press further, “really, you’re going to kick it here?” He responds, “well, I don’t know what I am doing, let me take a time out and think about it.” Being sarcastic, he’s planning on running up the score, so he calls time out and plans to go for a touchdown. I’m ecstatic, because I am confident I have a decent chance at pulling out a win.

Back to the game, his offensive squad comes back to the field, and he starts heckling me — but just then, he orchestrates a slant right pass behind the defensive line, which Eric Wright intercepts. “SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!” and then he goes silent. I don’t laugh, but respond with “pride cometh before the fall”, and line up for a running play, since it’s first and ten on or about our 6 yard line. I am a Cleveland Browns fan, I am going to win this one respectfully, or so I thought….

THEN, this kid quits the game! I get the win, but no stats emailed to me, which is disappointing. Which brings me to this blog post, and the kid’s XBOX360 gamertag.

Z2 IVIoNsT3R 2Z — you lost to the Cleveland Browns with the clearly superior San Diego Chargers and quit. I hope you google yourself and find this post. You’re a disgrace to online gaming and I wish you the worst luck possible in the future. If I didn’t give you horrible ratings (I did), I would love to beat you again in the future. I’d post the stats here, but I don’t get them via email when you’re a crybaby and quit. Pansy.

Go BROWNS, sucka!

Sincerely, bomble13

Permanent posting here.

Cleveland Stealers: How Ohio protectionism hurts America

Cleveland is a town known for its loyalty. In the 1990s, we were noted for our loyalty to our football team, the Browns. More recently, we were loyal to LeBron James, the self-dubbed “King” our championship-bereft city. Over the past few decades, we were loyal to our breadwinner: steel.

There is a connection between LeBron James leaving and the decline of the steel industry in Cleveland. Whereby LeBron left us because we couldn’t facilitate a city that his buddies Wade and Bush would come to, Cleveland similarly experienced the exodus of the steel industry because we couldn’t make our city a place where that industry could compete at a national and international level.

Unlike many of my fellow Clevelanders, including the owner of the Cavaliers Dan Gilbert, I never made the argument that Cleveland deserved or had a special claim to LeBron. Like a business or any individual, he can leave Cleveland for any reason, just like I did. (My gripe was how he shamed his home region on national television.) Economic actors, be they companies or people, can move freely for a variety of reasons. If for some reason, their growth or success is impeded by local constraints, they can move. Individuals like Rush Limbaugh and other relatively wealthy individuals can leave New York if that state “soaks the rich” with higher taxes. Similarly, companies can leave California if their climate becomes an impediment to their future success.

Therein lies the secret to why Cleveland is regarded by many as a dying city. Our denizens wrongly thought Cleveland deserved LeBron, just like they deserved a portion of the world’s steel industry. In a market economy, either domestically or internationally, you don’t deserve anything — you have to earn it.

In the 1960’s, 1970’s, and even during President George W. Bush’s tenure in 2002, the U.S. either slapped import quotas or tariffs on steel from other countries. All of these actions were economic malarkey that ultimately harmed Cleveland, Ohio, and the United States as a whole.

For one, much of the information that allegedly justified either import quotas or tariffs was based on the reports provided by domestic companies. In many cases, the government does not do its own detailed research as to whether or not their foreign competition were really “dumping” products on our market below cost. Supposedly, domestic producers would have us believe that the foreign competition would run our industries out of business and later raise prices once they’ve achieved a monopoly.

Aside from the fact the fact that steel is made throughout the world in countries like Japan, China, Russia, Trinidad/Tobago, Venezuela, Mexico, and Brazil — the fact that most of the data that the International Trade Commission uses is often provided from the domestic industry seeking so-called “protection” makes this a total ruse.

How can the government possibly ascertain what the cost differentials are for a foreign steel company that might have weak domestic demand in their home country, where costs are higher for smaller orders, versus international demand where costs are lower as a function of economies of scale? The unfortunate fact is that our government, along with other governments, have not done their due diligence to determine whether prices for steel were/are “below cost” or just lower due to economies of scale and larger aggregate demand in foreign markets like ours.

Well, from the late 1960s to present, American steel producers have gotten their wishes fulfilled — protection. Well, what happened?

Regardless of political action, employment in domestic steel production declined from 521,000 in 1974 to 151,000 in 2000. As Cleveland natives know all too well, steel companies went under right and left.

Why couldn’t protectionism save Cleveland? Well, even after import quotas and tariffs, foreign steel was still more affordable than steel made in Cleveland and other parts of the United States. Cleveland could not compete.

Sadly, Cleveland’s protectionist nature reared its ugly head, and the failed attempts to keep our steel industry limping along had other repercussions. In 2002, when President Bush made the poor decision to levy such tariffs, The Wall Street Journal noted:

New steel tariffs would cost about eight American jobs for every one steel job protected, according to a study last year by economists Joseph Francois and Laura Baughman of Trade Partnership Worldwide.

Some of the biggest losers would be the steel-belt states that tariffs are supposed to help. Illinois would lose ?ve jobs for every one protected, Ohio three for every one and Pennsylvania and Indiana two for one. New tariffs would even hurt parts of the steel industry itself, and thus some steel-workers, too. AK Steel of Middletown, Ohio, has invested more than $1 billion to use imported steel slabs and now employs 11,600; what would Mr. Bush tell them? And all of that damage is before any foreign nation decides to retaliate against U.S. exports, as they probably will.

The Francois/Baughman report also found that:

  • The Bush proposal would protect between 4,375 steel jobs and 8,900 steel jobs at a cost to American consumers every year of $439,485 to $451,509 per steel job protected.
  • Higher prices and other inefficiencies imposed by the Bush administration’s actions would increase costs between $1.9 billion and $4.0 billion a year on consumers, and decrease U.S. national income by $500 million to $1.4 billion a year.
  • Steel-consuming industries would face greater competition from foreign manufacturers, as foreign manufacturers would have access to more competitively-priced steel inputs than U.S. steel users. The tariffs imposed on steel imports would raise the price of these inputs for U.S. steel-using manufacturers but would not raise prices for foreign manufacturers of steel-containing products. As a result, imports of finished steel products, like electric motors, construction materials, appliances and autos, would increase.

Throughout the 1990s, over 30 U.S. Steel companies went bankrupt. “Legacy costs,” which are the inflated costs incurred by industries for their retirees in industries that are heavily unionized were bogging down steel producers. GM and Chrysler experienced a similar fate, having legacy costs significantly add to the price of their products, which in turn, made them less competitive.

Even after decades of political stunts to protect American steel, in the end the market determined which entities won and lost. No thanks to our government. And, to make things worse, the quotas and tariffs harmed our economy, with little to show and net job losses.

A 1984 Federal Trade Commission study estimated that steel quotas cost the U.S. economy $25 for each additional dollar of profit of American steel producers. A negative multiplying effect of $1 : 25!

Also intriguing to point out is that, on average, the U.S. steel industry supplied no less than 70% of U.S. steel during the period of 1990-2001.

Back to LeBron. He left Cleveland because we could not facilitate a team that could win championships. As the Plain Dealer pointed out, winning regular season games doesn’t amount to squat if you cannot win in the playoffs. In a similar vein, it does not matter how much of the steel you supply at any given point if you cannot compete with other economic actors, as evidenced by the increase in imported steel depicted above. If you lose that competitive edge, your competition will gain market share, and it is up to you to cover that ground.

In my earlier post on the fallacy of buying local, I questioned why anyone would intentionally make himself poorer to keep an inefficient economic actor in business. This applies here also. But, in this instance, the government stepped in and prevented consumers from choosing whether or not to buy locally made steel. The imposition of import quotas and tariffs is a direct affront to the right of consumers to make their own decisions about from whom to purchase components. I realize that the “right” I speak of is not codified in law, but it should be.

An example of why import quotas and tariffs are unjust. There are two gas stations across the street from one another corner.

One is a locally-owned filling station that is not part of a major chain. It charges $3.00 per gallon and all of its components, like ethanol, are made in the United States. Let’s call this station “LTZ Gas.”

But, across the street is another gas station that gets its gas from abroad, does not have the government-mandated ethanol (Just let me dream) and is $2.25 per gallon. This gas station is called “Gas Importers.”

If you were in need of gas, which station would you choose? Certainly, most would pick Gas Importers because their price is lower. The imposition of import quotas and tariffs is like a police officer parked at the intersection who pulls you over before you make your choice. If you choose “LTZ Gas” the officer lets you pass. But, in an effort to be “fair” he informs you that the law will only let you buy one gallon of gas at “Gas Importers” at the lower price and then you will pay a .75 cent per gallon tariff on each additional gallon you purchase, just so LTZ won’t go out of business because their component inputs and cost of labor are higher.

Is that fair? No. But this is what happens, with tariffs and import quotas and American business are hurt by it. Consumers are forced by government decree to either buy from LTZ or pay artificially higher prices on gas from Gas Importers. Obviously, if the consumer’s business is dependent on gas, like a pizza delivery guy, he becomes less competitive because his cost of doing business goes up through higher prices, and that cost gets passed along to you in the form of more expensive pizza. As a result, the pizza delivery guy is routinely stiffed on tips, and is ultimately poorer. All because LTZ could not compete with Gas Importers.

To jump back in to steel briefly, the 2002 tariffs were estimated to raises prices on U.S. consumers between $2 and $4 billion, decreasing national income between $500 million and $1.4 billion.

Just like gas prices fluctuate, so do steel prices. What tends not to fluctuate as much, however, are the costs of labor and taxes. This is why some producers in other countries will have a comparative advantage in steel production. But, as we all know, comparative advantage isn’t just limited to countries. Some states have a comparative advantage over Ohio, which is why we lost a lot of tire manufacturing to southern states like Georgia.

Back to steel, the tariffs President George W. Bush imposed allegedly would protect between 4,375 and 8,900 jobs — at the expense of an estimated 35,000 to 71,200 jobs. Now, if you were one of those 35,000+ workers who lost their jobs, you might not realize the connection between tariffs or import quotas and why you lost your job. Similarly, you might not realize that because of these protectionist actions, your golf clubs, new car, or house now costs more. Sadly, President Obama is headed down the same road, but at a faster pace.

What it boils down to is thievery, thus the title of this post. Forcing consumers to pay higher prices is akin to the direct taking of your wealth, depriving you of the decision to buy items at lower prices or forcing you to pay a tax to equalize competition between two unequal competitors.

Everyone reads with shame the stories of progressive communities structuring soccer games where nobody loses. It’s pathetic, I know. But on a smaller scale, forcing St. Dominic’s to accept a goal for every goal they score on Gesu is no different than taxing the products of more efficient economic actors to make things “fair” for the poor souls at Gesu who suck at soccer.

I commented on the Cleveland.com article about “buying local.” It should be no surprise that advocates of “buy local” would also support these tariffs. Heck, if they had it their way, you’d be forced to “buy local” which is often the effect of tariffs and import quotas. One commenter decried imports and said “import buying will lead to a very weak recovery in this area.” As if Cleveland has ever really experienced a recovery. Since generally accepted rate of “full employment” is 5.0%, you can see that Cleveland has rarely been at or near full employment for more than a few years.

(Click to expand.)

Cleveland’s problem is that we are overly dependent on too few industries. Just like nobody would expect you to invest all of your savings for retirement in a single stock, Cleveland expects that economic growth will magically appear if they do this. Obviously, this has not been the case. Cities should not rely on one industry, hoping they’ll somehow gain a comparative advantage. We can ask those in Flint, Michigan how well that experiment worked out for them.

To succeed, Cleveland needs to diversify. Given the area’s government corruption and stagnant political atmosphere with near complete Democratic control, it seems very unlikely that things will turn around. Taxes are too high, the government is way too involved with zoning, and education is  just plain horrible. Unions in schools, the public and private sector all play a very large part in this, too. However, Cleveland’s elected officials are clueless when it comes to finding answers.

ReasonTV did a recent feature entitled “Reason Saves Cleveland.” They interviewed a local official whose perspective is indicative of the backwards economic thinking of Cleveland:

Cimperman went on to explain that the city council’s role was to help business owners and residents “thread the needle” of endless regulations and mandates and edicts. (Cleveland has more than 20 zoning designations alone.) He boasted of helping a linen company—the last one of its kind within city limits—that had been trying for the better part of a decade to get variances allowing it to expand. With Cimperman’s help, the company managed to navigate the paperwork in a mere 18 months. When I talked with him about Houston’s less restrictive land use policies and wide-open approach to new businesses, he scoffed: “Houston is a joke.” If that’s true, the painful punch line is that during the last 50 years, Houston became the country’s fourth-largest city while Cleveland was sliding down to 41st.

Councilman Cimperman, who ran against Rep. Kucinich views the role of city council member as a facilitator for businesses to thread the needle of our archaic laws. That approach is backwards and wrong. Cimperman obviously doesn’t realize that it is he, as a member of the City Council who writes the laws. If it takes 18 months for a business to expand, what business is going to stay in Cleveland? Rather than have business be forced to “thread the needle” why not just get rid of the needle all together? This climate needs to change if Cleveland wants to diversify and attract jobs.

We’ve had two Republican mayors since World War Two. Cleveland Democrats won’t take on unions, because they represent the power base that gets them elected in what remains of Cleveland. What Cleveland needs is a Michelle Rhee to take on the Cleveland Teachers Union, paired with a Chris Christie as mayor. However, even with the formation of the new Cuyahoga County Council, I doubt much will change and Cleveland will slip further into the economic oblivion, if we let it.

FURTHER READING:

Protectionist Welfare for Steel

The Ailing Steel Industry Needs Less Government Intervention, Not More

LeBron James, Loyalty and the Economic Future of Cleveland

Reason Saves Cleveland

If there’s one thing that can revitalize Cleveland, it’s some new, libertarian ideas. Cleveland, like many rust belt and New England cities, is dying because it’s a cesspool of bad ideas and corruption. I’d encourage you to watch this series as it comes out next month.

People wonder how I, a native son of ultra liberal Shaker Heights, could leave being a major Republican and free marketeer (no, we don’t have mouseketeer ears, even though some good economists wear them.) One hilarious video suggested that “Cleveland’s main export is crippling depression”. If it means the shitty Democratic ideas that have ruined Cleveland, then they’re right.

For every Republican in Shaker Heights, there are probably at least 23 Democrats. When people leave Shaker, odds are, they bring their horrible liberal ideas with them. I have great friends who are Democrats from Shaker. Most of them have left because they’re reasonable and have gone on to do better things. I’ll disagree with them on most issues, but I acknowledge if they ran Shaker and Cleveland, it would be a better place. Then again, maybe that’s the whole thing, smart people see the problems and leave, moving on to greener pastures. Former Cleveland Mayor Jane Campbell alluded to that in a speech to my high school at St. Ignatius. Not that she exactly practices what she preaches, because she and I currently work in the same place, but I think her point is right. Which is why I’d like to return to Cleveland some day and make a difference and see the Browns win a Superbowl (not that it will probably happen.)

The only reason Shaker survives is because it’s a safehaven for wealthy people. If you told somebody in Shaker they had to live 5 miles away but not in Shaker, Beachwood, Cleveland Heights, or University Heights, or leave Ohio entirely, I doubt 1/10 of them would stay. No way they’d live in Euclid, East Cleveland, North Randall, Warrensville or Cleveland itself. Shaker has high taxes, spends a boatload on education with decent, but not great, results, and has a police force second-to-none, so that everyone feels safe in the utopia of a community named for a practically dead religion that made nice furniture and didn’t believe in sex.

I came to be the way I am because I left Shaker, and saw that it is an exception. This city hates capitalism so much we don’t even have a McDonald’s. I learned to embrace capitalism in St. Louis, which has its faults too. By no means do I hate Shaker. I have amazingly great friends from there, and loved growing up there, but if that’s all you know, you don’t know much about the real world. Again, Shaker is the exception, because it’s a city of relative wealth fending itself from the problems of surrounding cities, built on the same shitty ideas.

Some fun facts about Cleveland, from a recent article from MSNBC, describing my home town as “The most miserable city in America“:

  • In 1978 it became the first U.S. city to default on its debts since the Great Depression. (Dennis Kucinich was mayor at the time, yet, people have been routinely sending that space cadet to the U.S. House of Representatives ever since — you’d think  people would realize a mayor who bankrupted the city would help lead the way in bankrupting the country. But no, Clevelanders haven’t.)
  • Cleveland secured the position thanks to its high unemployment, high taxes, lousy weather, corruption by public officials and crummy sports teams (Cavaliers of the NBA excepted). (Why do you think that many sunbelt cities thrive even though we’re in a prolonged recession? Low taxes and less regulation. Cleveland — Shaker especially — has horribly high taxes, and a bunch of corrupt Democratic politicians to boot.)
  • Northern Ohio has seen 309 public officials convicted of crimes over the past 10 years according to the Justice Department. A current FBI investigation of public officials in Cuyahoga County (where Cleveland is located) has ensnared more than two dozen government employees and businessmen on charges including bribery, fraud and tax evasion.
  • On the housing front Cleveland is dealing with thousands of abandoned homes. The city contributed to its foreclosure problem by providing down payments to many people that could not afford homes through the federally funded Afford-A-Home program. Cleveland led by Mayor Frank Jackson sued 21 large investment banks in 2008 who he felt were complicit in the subprime and foreclosure crisis that hit Cleveland hard. A federal judge dismissed the suit last year, but the city is appealing the ruling. (That’s right, the government is more to blame for housing woes than lenders. Even worse is our incompetent mayor. First the city puts people in homes they can’t afford, paying their down payments with local and federal tax dollars, and then sues when they get foreclosed on?  Newsflash: People who can’t afford 3-5% of a mortgage down payment will have an extremely hard time staying current on a mortgage. Way to go Cleveland, but you’re not alone there. It’s almost as if Barney Frank and Chris Dodd were in charge of housing…… Oh wait.)

The list goes on. Cleveland has had two Republican mayors since World War Two. Ralph Perk and George Voinovich, a retiring U.S. Senator. Drew Carey, if you bring The Price is Right back to Cleveland, I’ll move back there within one year and help you bring this city back to greatness. Heck, I’ll probably move back there someday anyway.

Better luck next year, Pittsburgh

Mangini, I am still not happy with you. But, tonight, you, Phil Dawson, the Browns Defense, and Josh Cribbs should celebrate. Brady Quinn, you didn’t blow it, but you have yet to earn my respect.

Good job.

groupsackjgjpg-1a37ee27eae780de_medium

Browns vs. Steelers muni lot tailgate party

Romeo, Romeo…

Yes, Romeo. I miss you big time, which is why I made this image to prove to my fellow Browns fans that firing you was a very bad idea.